MBSonMND: MBS RECAP
Open MBSonMND Dashboard | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 4:00 PM EST |
Afternoon Market Updates
A recap of MBS Market Updates provided by MND Analysts and streamed live to the MBSonMND Dashboard
.
3:51PM :
Drifting Sideways In Quiet After Hours Trade
In the previous update, we noted the potential net effect of earlier movements in the 10yr yield could serve to merely adjust the range of the trend-channel slightly wider. So far, that seems to be what we're seeing in the after-hours session. This could set up momentum going into tomorrow's auction, with a positively received auction serving to preserve the channel.
3:01PM :
Range Break Fails To Get Confirmation. Safe From Reprices For Now
After 10yr yields moved higher past both the horizontal and diagonal technical support today, there has not been an uptick in volume and neither have they continued to forge into higher territory. Mos likely, this will merely lead to an adjustment wider of the trend channel and end up looking like a failed pivot confirmation only. In fact, everything is largely sideways as FNCL 4.5's continue to hover in their same range around 102-04, currently at 102-03.
2:22PM :
ALERT:
10's Tested and Broke Support. No Follow-Through Or Volume
Previously, we had discussed the intersection of horizontal pivot-point and the resistance line of today's trend channel just between 3.4 and 3.41, yields have broken through this level, but the lack of volume or convicted follow-through casts it's significance into doubt as a precursor of reprices for the worse. Nonetheless, it's a possibly negative technical development that we'll need to watch closely to see if volume or momentum picks up.
1:38PM :
ALERT:
10's Rise In Recent Minutes, But Not Yet Threatening Pivot
While the trend channel noted earlier today continues to provide resistance to tepidly rallying 10yr notes, the pivot point just under 3.41 (Friday's low yields) has not been revisited. In the past half hour, yields moved about 2 bps higher and may attempt to test the pivot point, which incidentally coincides with the upper line of the trend channel at this particular time of day. If they break, it's likely bad (short term) news for MBS as well, but nothing is too dire on this data-less Monday with light volume.
1:10PM :
New MBS Commentary Post
12:50PM :
C30 Loan Pricing 21bps Better on Average
Conventional 30 year fixed loan pricing is 21bps better on average today with the largest rebate improvements seen in the loan paper used to fill 4.0 MBS trades: 4.375% to 4.625% notes. These gains are however not large enough to move the BestEX C30 lower from 4.875%. On average, among the five majors, the permanent buydown from 4.875 to 4.75% costs 93.8bps, illustrating a lack of liquidity in FNCL 4.0s.
12:03PM :
3.40 Pivot Point In 10yr Notes Supportive Following POMO
After the conclusion of the open market operation Fed Buyback, yields moved slightly higher, but thus far have gone no higher than the lowest yields seen on the 21st. This is a promising pivot point from which to begin the week, but MBS would like to see more commitment from treasuries as the FNCL 4.5 remains down a few ticks at 102-01. 10yr yields at 3.4005 remain to close to declare definitely supportive of the pivot point at 3.4062 so we'll need to watch and wait for it's confirmation or rejection.
12:02PM :
Focused Weakness in Production MBS Coupons
Benchmark Treasuries are holding steady near their best levels of the day after the Fed lifted $8.9 billion in Treasuries this morning. However the same cannot be said about production MBS coupons which are underperforming benchmarks (yield spreads wider). This is indicative of focused selling and a general lack of demand for "rate sheet influential MBS. If Treasuries fail to maintain positive progress and benchmark yields begin to rise, MBS prices are likely to fall faster which would lead to reprices for the worse. BEWARE: trading volumes are generally low and the chance for price volatility is high.
11:28AM :
New MBS Commentary Post
11:21AM :
New MBS Commentary Post
11:15AM :
Moderate Positivity Continues. MBS Gain A Tick
Following the Fed's POMO wrapping up at 11AM, treasuries continue to operate in the best section of their trend channel, still pushing the bullish end, now with 10yr notes at 3.407. MBS FNCL 4.5's have picked up a tick in the process, now standing at 102-05. However, they'll need to break 102-06 to get into their highs of the days. Despite the fact that recent weeks have usually seen a more bullish bond market following Fed POMO's, this is not necessarily a safe assumption on an ongoing basis if the details released about the operation vary from the recent norm of lifting On-The-Run securities.
Featured Market Discussion
A recap of the featured comments from the Live Discussion on the MBSonMND Dashboard
.
Jason Zimmer : "not sure...i'm going to load new calyx sometime this week to find out. it's mandated use is 1/30/2011"
Chris Kopec : "Jason....wazzup with the new TIL?...anything important?"
Chris Kopec : "Speaking as a Calyx user, I last upgraded to conform to GFE20101....I'm not doing out more cash unless regulations for me to upgrade further."
rford : "Need some help: I am trying to renew our Calyx subscription for the year and they have increased the fees 300%. Sure feels like I am getting hustled and I would like to look into switching systems on principle. Any advice on the other software systems woiuld be greatly appreciated."
Mike Drews : "i locked one...9 february deal floating"
Thomas Quann : "Locked 6 today.....feeling better about the pipeline now. Still most floating."
Adam Dahill : "I'm taking a few locks today just to protect and GUTFLOP"
Adam Quinones : "GSE REFORM: Kicking the Can Down the Road. Leadership Needed"
Bob V-G : "state of the union address"
Jason York : "we don't have anything big this week until Wed right?"
Matthew Graham : "I don't think it's that linear of a relationship... QE2 retreats on the assumption the economy has better developed legs"
Lion : "Could this be so? QE1 raised bond prices and sent rates to historic lows. QE2 may help equities burst through 12,000. Question: when QE2 runs out will equities retreat 40% as did bond yields?"
Matthew Graham : "Hourly moving average of volume in 10yr futures contracts is about 50k at the moment versus roughly 75k at the same time yesterday. Certainly a thinner market. Understandable given the absence of data and two important events coming up in the next two days... Not to mention auctions."
Adam Quinones : "short covering i believe."
Adam Quinones : "very thin market"
Jason Wilborn : "DOW closing in on 12K"
Bromi Krock : "That is a really good heads up AQ. From the market's reaction to data starting 11/3 sentiment still points to recovery buying of equities and selling of fixed income."
Adam Quinones : "On the other side of the coin we've got the FOMC statement on Wednesday afternoon. A status quo message is expected and new forward looking guidance will probably be minimal. So from that perspective we'd be watching for an "eh, nothing new, recovery inching along" FOMC statement on Wednesday. But that gets us thinking...maybe we're too comfortable with status quo? The Fed's rhetorical powers are at full capacity when we least expect them to be. With a status quo sentiment in place, we can't o"
Chris Kopec : "I saw that AQ....that's what's got me thinking about 3.60 on the 10 year at some point this week."
Adam Quinones : "please read the latest MBS Com post for more on that bear flag and range break motivation"
Kent Mikkola #353976 : "partial refund Aaron"
Aaron Meyer : "if you refinance out of an FHA loan in 2 years are you entitled to a refund of the upfront FHA fee?"
Peter Gladkin : "We can't go back and undo what is done... we can only improve on the actions we take in the future"
Frank Ceizyk : "they were never designed to be a financing mechanism for speculative real estate investing. but that is what they became--and no one in the housing industry, government, federal reserve did a think to stop the bubble from inflating until it was too late. "
Chris Kopec : "Peter.....break up the big banks first, and I'd be more inclined to agree"
Peter Gladkin : "The problem is Fannie and Freddie have turned into something they were never suppose to be. We all laughed at the comment about their competing with the private markets (what private markets)... The problem I fear is they are beyond fixing... better to let the free market destroy them, so they can be replaced by free market entrepenuership, by something that works and is efficient moving forward... constructive destruction is a healthy part of free market capitalism, we need to allow this to hap"
Steve : "I believe its good discussion Brett, its very relevant to our industry, and more should be involved"
Chris Kopec : "Steve, I share your opinion on the need to reform the GSEs. I'll criticize Fannie and Freddie for their huge executive bonuses, and their ability to make political campaign contributions.....but I won't find fault with a mission to provide affordable housing and financing options of the public. Again, their core mission was largely successful, until it was polluted by political influence."
John Rodgers : "again, you guys blame one thing on the collapse. I don't see it that way. There were multiple factors that caused it. I am not liberal BTW."
Peter Gladkin : "Was it a success because the government was involved or because it was a "quasi" government entity? I think the latter. Unfortunately in 08 Fannie and Freddie were seized by our government and are no longer "quasi." Look at the result."
John Rodgers : "The same tax payers that paid trillions in property taxes over 70 years?"
Steve : "when they are costing taxpayers billions a month to run them in their current state -- YES"
John Rodgers : "I call that a knee jerk reaction. "
John Rodgers : "So, let me get this straight, We had a quasi government program that worked for 70 years? We have a couple of bad years and everyone wants to dismantle them?"
Chris Kopec : "My point is that Fannie was formed in responde to a similar climate following the Great Depression. Fannie, and later Freddie, did an excellent job for decades. If anything, their downfall was tied to "mixing with the wrong crowd". I'm not going to give a pass to politicians on the left and right that allowed Fannie/Freddie to morph from staid, boring, and effective insitutions into political animals. My point is that their core mission was successful for an extended period of time. "
Peter Gladkin : "pension funds, unsurance companies.... not the government printing greenbacks issuing new bonds"
John Rodgers : "Where do you think all the money would come from to fund private lenders?"
John Rodgers : "First Franklin, D1, Aurora were all offering programs with poor scores and high LTV's"
Peter Gladkin : "Chris government policy and legislation is what led to the collapse, repeal of the Glass Steagall and the introduction of the CRA."
Steve : "more risk was also forced on them by regulators and C R A"
John Rodgers : "Fannie and Freddie started losing market share therefore took more risk in the mid 2000's"
Chris Kopec : "Did not say there was one factor. I'm pointing out that subprime was a major accelerant."
John Rodgers : "I disagree Chris, There was not one factor that led to the collapse even though "some" haters want you to believe that. The combination of cheap money, risky loan products, over developing and inflated appraised values "
Peter Gladkin : "Chris, I could not disagree with you more... we do not need more GSEs."
Steve : "its going to be a very tricky game of Jenga taking them down/ apart without collapsing "
Peter Gladkin : "I think we need to stop artificially supporting markets, financials, real estate, car industry, etc, and let the economy sort itself out.... no more meddling or government interference... let the chips fall."
Chris Kopec : "I've always had the opinion that we need more GSE's, not less....specifically, a GSE for jumbo, one for subrpime, and perhaps, a GSE to handle TPO production."
Chris Kopec : "If memory serves, the mortgage meltdown was ignited within the subprime market, which was (largely) dominated by private investors. "
John Rodgers : "Fannie and Freddie would have been fine if they would not have tried to compete with the first franklin's of the world"
Chris Kopec : "Removing Fannie and Freddie would grant even more "systemic importance" to certain companies, and I can't see that being in the best interest of anyone (other than those "systemically important" players)."